The millennial “baby blip” is now over

Demographics
The millennial “baby blip” is now over
Glenn  Capuano

Glenn Capuano

Customer Success Manager

Key Highlights

  • Between 2003 and 2012, Australia experienced a notable rise in birth rates, termed the "millennial baby blip." This period saw the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) increase, peaking at 2.02 babies per woman in 2008, approaching the replacement level of 2.1. 
  • By 2017, the TFR had declined to 1.741, marking the lowest fertility rate ever recorded in Australia. This drop signifies the conclusion of the baby blip era. 
  • The surge in birth rates during the baby blip is attributed to factors such as the introduction of the "baby bonus" in 2004 and increased migration, which expanded the population of women in childbearing age.
  • The average age of mothers has risen to around 32 years, with significant increases in fertility among women in their late 30s and early 40s, and declines among teenagers and women in their early 20s.
  • Fertility rates vary across regions, with higher rates observed in rural areas and growth suburbs on urban fringes, while inner-city areas tend to have lower rates.
  • Understanding these demographic shifts is crucial for accurate population forecasting and planning, as tools like forecast.id incorporate specific birth rates for different areas to provide detailed insights. 

Whenever we’re talking about the big-picture demographic story in Australia, the graph below showing a millennial ‘baby blip’ will usually make an appearance. Now, Glenn writes, we can say the baby blip is over.

 

We’ve been talking for a while at .id about how birth rates increased during the early part of the 21st Century. This increase in babies born in Australia has lead to a recent influx of children into our schools, both primary, and now secondary schools just in the last couple of years.

The birth rate is measured by what’s called the “Total fertility rate”, or TFR. It’s an age-adjusted measure that allows comparison between areas, and represents the number of babies a woman can expect to have over her lifetime – if her lifetime was covered by the current fertility rates which existed in the given year.

This chart, courtesy of the ABS, with annotations by me, shows how the TFR has changed over the past 70 years in Australia.

 

Source: ABS, Births, Australia, 2017 (3301.0) – See the original here.

 

As you can see, the generation that we call the “baby boomers” were born during a time of high fertility rates, with average babies per woman over 3. This ended after the introduction of The Pill in 1961, giving rise to “Generation X” and then increasing participation of women in the workforce during the 1970s drove the birth rate down to levels around 1.8 to 2, where it has been sitting ever since. The exception was the time from about 2003 to 2012, which we call the “baby blip”, when fertility rates increased sharply again.

Though the peak of this blip was much lower than the baby boom, the actual number of births was much higher, peaking first in 2012, at 309,600, then again in 2016, at 311,000. Though the rate may be lower, there are a lot more people in Australia now (due largely to migration), so there are more babies being born.

What’s interesting is that in just the last year that we have data for, 2017, the TFR has now slipped to 1.741 babies per woman, which is just very slightly below the previous low point, in 2001, at 1.743, making it the lowest fertility rate ever recorded in Australia. At the 2008 peak, just 9 years earlier, TFR reached 2.02 babies per woman – almost replacement level. Replacement level for births is generally regarded as 2.1, which is the replacement of both parents, with an allowance for infant mortality. It’s likely that replacement level is actually a bit lower now, as Australia’s infant mortality is extremely low.

The other interesting thing about the change in birth rate is the age at which we are having children. This has changed dramatically over time. The overall fertility rate in 1975 was not much higher than 2017. But fertility peaked among women in their mid-20s and declined after that. Now the average age for mothers is around 32, and we’ve seen large increases in fertility among those in their late 30s and early 40s, with big declines in teenage mothers and those in their early 20s.

So what caused the millennial baby blip?

Well, some might say it was the government’s “baby bonus” which did seem to coincide with the start of the increase in 2003, when Peter Costello famously asked Australians to have “one for mum, one for dad, and one for the country”. I commented on this at the peak of the boom in 2011, and you can see my thoughts in the older article here.

Whatever the reasons for the baby blip, it’s well and truly over now. But we still have close to a record number of births each year. High migration continues to fuel Australia’s growth too. Even without migration, it would be 30 years or more before Australia’s population would start to decline due to low fertility rate, the way Japan’s is at the moment.

Fertility also differs markedly between areas. Growth suburbs on the urban fringe have higher birth rates than the city centre areas. But rural areas tend to have the highest rates of all. This has a big impact on your future population, and forecast.id takes these geographic differences into account. It has specific birth rates assumed for each small area, which gives you a great view of exactly what’s happening in each place within your region.

If you’re curious about the age structure of your local population, or would like to see forecasts for different age groups in the future, you can access demographic profiles and population forecasts for hundreds of council areas across Australia and New Zealand via our demographic resource centre.

STAY INFORMED

Subscribe to monthly updates