Overall deaths increasing, but the rate of death is declining.

Demographics
Overall deaths increasing, but the rate of death is declining.
Glenn  Capuano

Glenn Capuano

Customer Success Manager

  • Death rates are a key factor in population forecasting, as they form part of the “natural change” in population growth. Areas with older populations often experience more deaths than births, leading to natural decline without migration.

  • Australia’s 2024 death statistics show 187,268 deaths and a crude death rate (CDR) of 6.884 per 1,000 people—slightly higher than ten years ago, mainly due to an ageing population.

  • The standardised death rate (SDR), which adjusts for age differences, fell from 5.471 to 5.078 per 1,000 over the past decade—indicating improved health and longevity even as the population ages.

Understanding the death rate is very important in population forecasting. It’s not the brightest subject but it’s a fact of life that we all die eventually.  One aspect of progress can be seen as a lowering of the death rate, and an increase in the age at which we die (related to life expectancy). The number of deaths in an area forms part of the “natural change” component of population change which last year comprised 25% of Australia’s population growth. Most areas retain positive natural change with more births than deaths. But areas with an elderly population will often record more deaths than births, and would naturally decline in population without migration. In countries like Japan this has become the norm, but not in most parts of Australia where we have a younger (but ageing) population. Understanding this dynamic is very important to be able to accurately forecast the population.

In late September, new data were released by ABS showing the number and rate of deaths Australia-wide and broken down by region. In calendar year 2024, there were 187,268 deaths recorded in Australia, an increase of 4,137 from the previous year, and over 34,000 more than 10 years prior. The Crude death rate was 6.884 per 1,000 people – that’s just the number of deaths per 1,000 population. It increased a little from 6.542 ten years before. But that’s just due to ageing population.

A better measure of death rate is the Standardised death rate (SDR) which adjusts for different age structures to what the death rate would be in a population with a standard age structure (the actual population used currently is from the age structure back in 2001, but it doesn’t really matter what year as long as it’s standard across all calculations). The SDR for Australia in 2024 was 5.078 per 1,000 standard population, and that’s down from 5.471 ten years ago. That’s a good thing – it means even though we’re ageing, we’re less likely to die at any given age than 10 years ago.

If you’re planning a funeral home, you want to know the total number of deaths and the CDR.  If you’re looking analysing how healthy we are and whether we’re dying later over time, you want to look at the SDR, and possibly causes of death (which supplements this publication, out in November).

This chart directly from the ABS shows that the age-adjusted SDR has consistently declined over the past 40 years, though the rate of decline has slowed (you can also see the 2022 blip from COVID). Males still die at a faster rate than females but the gap is closing, with male death rates declining faster.

2024 Calendar Year by State/ Territory

DeathsMedian age at deathCrude Death Rate (CDR)Standardised Death Rate (SDR)
New South Wales 59,64182.47.034.998
Victoria45,94382.66.5814.908
Queensland38,90180.96.9645.361
South Australia15,73982.78.3815.27
Western Australia17,96981.56.064.815
Tasmania5,36581.19.3245.818
Northern Territory1,23968.54.8576.423
Australian Capital Territory2,42582.15.1154.559
Australia187,268826.8845.078


At a state/territory level, Tasmania has by far the highest Crude death rate, due to its much older population. When age standardised though, the SDR is only a little above the national average. The ACT has the lowest death rate (both crude and standardised), with an SDR of 4.559 in 2024. The Northern Territory actually has the lowest CDR, but the highest SDR, and by far the lowest age at death (median age 68.5 years). This is due to the large Aboriginal population in the NT – it’s a significant measure of Indigenous disadvantage – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people consistently have higher death rates than other Australians. Nationally the SDR for this group is 9.9, almost double the national average and it’s increasing. But the population is much younger and so this is hidden when using the crude rate.

As a group they are also disproportionately are also more likely to live in remote areas with limited health services, and these areas tend to have the highest death rates overall. The smallest population LGAs don’t have a standardised death rate published (and this includes most of the Aboriginal councils), but the highest SDRs among those who are published are in Derby-West Kimberley (12.3) and Wyndham-East Kimberley (10.8), followed by some remote areas of NSW – Coonamble (9.9) and Bourke (9.8). These are all around double the national average, and represent some of the most remote areas in Australia.

The areas with the lowest standardised death rates are mainly in our capital cities, and tend to be in the most wealthy areas.

 

Top 10 LGAs - Lowest Death Rates 2022 - 2024

Population 2024Deaths 2024SDR 2024
Lane Cove NSW 42,566 1603.1
Mosman NSW29,253 1753.1
North Sydney NSW72,909 3123.2
Ku-ring-gai NSW 128,362 8733.6
Woollahra NSW 55,175 3613.6
Adelaide Plains SA11,302 463.6
Nedlands WA25,104 1633.7
Joondalup WA173,469 8563.8
Willoughby NSW79,634 3893.9
Burnside SA47,810 3363.9

The lowest of all are Lane Cove and Mosman on Sydney Harbour – in fact this list is very similar to the top 10 LGAs in SEIFA (Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage/Disadvantage) – 5 of the top 10 SEIFA scores are in there, including the top 3 (and North Sydney falls 11th).  This shows there is a strong correlation between socio-economic status and health, including lower death rates. In short, where you live influences how long you are likely to live. If you live in a wealthy area, you’re more likely to live longer. Lower socio-economic and particularly remote areas have lower life expectancy. Adelaide Plains is the outlier here, the only one of these top 10 with a SEIFA score outside the top decile. However the population is far lower than the others and this may be a statistical anomaly over a couple of years.

Zoom in on this map to find your LGA, including the number of deaths registered in 2024, and the Standardised Death Rate for your area. Note that everywhere in the grey colour does not have a SDR calculated, due to low population, but does have a deaths number shown.

 

 

So death rates vitally important in population forecasting, where we include them in our “top-down” assumptions looking at the most likely future population of Australia. But they are also a key indicator in understanding the socio-economic characteristics of your area. Understanding the interplay between death rates, socio-economic characteristics, access to health care and welfare services can help in planning to help improve an area, apply for funding and advocate for local communities.  .id’s experience is in consulting with you to find the best possible datasets to help you understand your community and what can provide the best outcomes.

In mid-October 2025 we get a view of the other side of the equation – birth rates for 2024, which have been in decline for some time. And in November we will have an update on the Causes of Death, which increasingly show the biggest killers are those that strike in old age.

 

STAY INFORMED

Subscribe to monthly updates